Skip to content

Detention Watch Network Disheartened By Senate Immigration Bill #CIR

June 27, 2013

Urges Congress to take a stand against policies that do not align with our country’s values of fairness and due process

WASHINGTON – June 27, 2013 – With the passage of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act (S.744) in the Senate, Detention Watch Network (DWN) is expressing disappointment at the current state of the bill. Although the bill contains several positive detention provisions, including considering alternatives to detention for individuals who are subject to mandatory detention without judicial review, the impact of these potential reforms has been curtailed by the dramatic shift the Senate made during closed door negotiations over the weekend.

These deeply troubling negotiations led to the inclusion of the Corker-Hoeven “border surge” amendment, an agreement to dramatically expand border militarization and unprecedented levels of enforcement. This bipartisan deal is a game changer in the immigration reform debate since it will bring the shadow of militarization to America. If this bill becomes the law, it will swallow our traditional values of freedom and liberty for all and gravely endanger our rights and dignity.

“The Senate bill as it stands, with the addition of the Corker-Hoeven amendment, shows that our Senators have bowed down to politics and are forsaking the safety of border communities,” said Andrea Black, Executive Director of DWN. “As a result, they are moving forward with a bill that is not the common sense, fair, and just immigration reform they promised. The private-prison industry and other enforcement industry contractors stand to gain the most from the legislation while families and communities will suffer.”

The Senate bill contains several positive detention provisions, most significantly requiring DHS to consider the use of alternatives to detention for all immigrants, except those suspected of terrorist activities. This means that individuals subject to mandatory detention will now be eligible for alternatives programs. Additionally, alternatives would be redefined to include community-based and NGO models.

However, these reforms are overshadowed by a vast expansion of enforcement that will lead to more immigrants being funneled into detention and processed for deportation. The bill will exclude people with criminal convictions from the legalization process, leaving those individuals vulnerable to detention and deportation. It would also triple the number of criminal prosecutions for border crossers (to 210 people daily at the Tucson Federal Courthouse) through “Operation Streamline” mass hearings, resulting in the expansion of the prison population and private prison profits. Through “Operation Streamline” and related efforts, 82,250 individuals were criminally prosecuted for immigration violations in 2011 alone, constituting over 50% of all federal prosecutions, costing $1,023,615,633.60, and resulting in Latinos now representing more than 50% of the federal prison population (while accounting for only 16% of the national population).

While the potential path to citizenship for some of the 11 million immigrants in the U.S. would bring much needed relief for families and communities, the current bill does not align our immigration policies with our country’s values of fairness and due process. True reform of the immigration system would include the repeal of mandatory detention and exclusion of excessive enforcement that funnels more individuals into the detention and deportation system.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. James Quinn permalink
    June 27, 2013 6:31 pm

    Imagine that. Actually prosecuting immigrants for their crimes and having them have to abide by the law to become citizens? One questions exactly what ” border communities” you seek to protect, those here ;legally or illegally?

    • June 28, 2013 4:59 pm

      I don’t think anyone benefits from national guard troops stationed throughout the 100-mile border zone, documented or undocumented. Excessive policing throughout the US has led to unprecedented levels of 4th amendment violations and the destruction of poor communities and black and Latino communities. National Guard troops would take this to a whole other level.
      Border security needs to be narrowly focused on drug trafficking, violence as there are some serious issues and needs at the border. Not to go after every weak individual by violating constitutional rights. Undocumented immigrants are still human beings and have the right to due process. Instead ICE will search for proof of legality anytime, anywhere without regard to probable cause, and the policy of funnelling migrants through the most dangerous region of the Arizona desert, leading to at least 2500 deaths and probably many more, is a violation of international law. “Criminals” are still human beings! We treat murderers with more dignity than undocumented immigrants.

      • James Quinn permalink
        June 28, 2013 6:58 pm

        If you call allowing 11,000,000 (probably much more) unknown people being allowed to enter this country “excessive policing” then I strongly question your definition. The so-called war on drugs, as you propose to be a priority is a dismal failure. The constitution applies to citizens so I really don’t see enforcing the immigration laws as any sort of violation. Your argument of “funneling” lends itself to the argument that a homeowner should be severely prosecuted when a burglar breaks into his house and injures himself – yes, this does happen – but that doesn’t mean it is right. In some cases I may agree with your last line regarding the way we treat murderers. However, that doesn’t mean we need to let up on enforcement only maybe adjust the way we deal with murderers.

        In short, our problems extend way beyond those we are not able to document to those we have documented (allowed in legally) and then failed to monitor as to their behavior as “guests” of our country. The Boston Marathon comes to mind as well as other instances. In fact, I have my own story of a “presumed” legal alien who through fraud and deceit has been able to obtain a green card despite her crimes (student visa fraud, 5 individual counts of theft, perjury, forgery, misrepresentation of fact- lying on her green card application, and many more too numerous to list here). But I’m sure you would see these as merely “mistakes” and she should be given another chance – although she is on her 6th or 7th chance now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: